PA66 GF30 so với GF50: Bảng thông số kỹ thuật đầy đủ, tính chất và hướng dẫn lựa chọn

PA66 GF30 vs GF50 injection molded test specimens side by side
PA66 GF30 and GF50 injection molded test specimens for mechanical property evaluation

When engineers design structural components in automotive, industrial equipment, or electrical housings, the first question is often: “Where do I find the datasheet for PA66 GF30?” And the second question usually follows within minutes: “Should I use GF50 instead?”

PA66 reinforced with 30% or 50% glass fiber represents two of the most widely specified engineering thermoplastics in the world. Both offer the heat resistance of polyamide 66 combined with the dramatic stiffness and strength improvements that glass fiber reinforcement delivers. But the numerical gap — 30% vs 50% — does not translate linearly to performance, and assuming “more glass is always better” leads to tooling surprises, warpage problems, and cost overruns.

This article consolidates the key datasheet values for PA66 GF30 and GF50 in one place, explains what each property means in practical design terms, maps out the major commercial grades from BASF, DuPont, and DSM, and gives you a clear decision framework for choosing between them.

Quick Comparison Table: PA66 GF30 vs GF50 Datasheet Values

The values below represent typical injection molded specimens tested at 23°C in the dry-as-molded condition (DAM). Always consult the specific grade datasheet for your selected material, as formulation differences — heat stabilization, impact modification, lubricant packages — can shift individual properties by 5–15%.

Tài sản Đơn vị PA66 chứa 30% sợi thủy tinh PA66 chứa 50% sợi thủy tinh Phương pháp thử nghiệm
Độ đặc g/cm³ 1.35 – 1.38 1.55 – 1.58 ISO 1183
Tensile Strength (Break) MPa 180 – 195 220 – 240 ISO 527
Mô-đun đàn hồi MPa 9,500 – 10,500 16,000 – 17,500 ISO 527
Cường độ uốn MPa 270 – 290 340 – 370 ISO 178
Hệ số uốn MPa 8,500 – 9,200 14,000 – 15,500 ISO 178
Thử nghiệm va đập có rãnh Charpy (23°C) kJ/m² 10 – 13 14 – 17 ISO 179/1eA
Charpy Notched Impact (−30°C) kJ/m² 7 – 9 10 – 13 ISO 179/1eA
HDT (1.8 MPa) °C 245 – 250 250 – 255 ISO 75-2/Af
Melting Point (DSC) °C 255 – 265 255 – 265 ISO 11357
Mold Shrinkage (Flow) % 0.30 – 0.55 0.15 – 0.30 ISO 294-4
Mold Shrinkage (Transverse) % 0.60 – 0.90 0.35 – 0.55 ISO 294-4
Điện trở suất bề mặt Ω 10¹² – 10¹³ 10¹² – 10¹³ Tiêu chuẩn IEC 60093

What Each Property Means in Practice

Tensile test curve chart comparing PA66 GF30 and GF50 stress-strain behavior
Typical stress-strain curves for PA66 GF30 and GF50 at 23°C, dry-as-molded condition

Tensile Strength and Modulus: The Core Stiffness Numbers

Tensile strength is the maximum stress the material can withstand while being pulled before it breaks. The jump from GF30 (approximately 185 MPa) to GF50 (approximately 230 MPa) represents a roughly 25% increase in ultimate strength. However, the tensile modulus — the material’s resistance to elastic deformation — nearly doubles. GF50 is dramatically stiffer: it stretches less under a given load. This matters for structural brackets, pump housings, and any application where deflection under load is the limiting design criterion rather than ultimate failure.

A practical consequence: if you are replacing die-cast aluminium with PA66, GF50 comes much closer to matching the stiffness of light metals. GF30 often requires ribbing or thicker wall sections to achieve equivalent structural rigidity.

HDT: Heat Deflection Under Load

The HDT at 1.8 MPa (ISO 75-Af) for both GF30 and GF50 sits in the 245–255°C range — close to the crystalline melting point of PA66 itself. The glass fibers create a rigid skeletal network that resists deformation even as the PA66 matrix softens. The 5°C advantage GF50 holds at the upper end is real but small. In practice, both grades are rated for similar continuous-use temperature windows. The HDT value confirms that short-term exposure to 240°C+ is feasible, but above 220°C oxidative degradation of the polyamide matrix accelerates regardless of glass content.

Shrinkage and Warpage: The Hidden Differentiator

This is where the GF30 vs GF50 decision gets interesting. GF30 exhibits mold shrinkage of 0.3–0.55% in the flow direction and 0.6–0.9% transverse — a roughly 2:1 anisotropy ratio. GF50 shrinks less overall (0.15–0.3% flow, 0.35–0.55% transverse), and the anisotropy ratio tightens to approximately 1.7:1.

Lower absolute shrinkage means GF50 molds closer to nominal dimensions. But higher glass content also means higher melt viscosity, which requires higher injection pressures and can increase residual stress if the part has abrupt wall thickness transitions. For large, flat parts, GF50’s lower and more isotropic shrinkage is a genuine advantage. For thin-walled parts with long flow paths, GF30 may fill more easily and warp less in practice despite the higher datasheet shrinkage numbers.

Các yếu tố cần lưu ý trong quá trình xử lý

GF50 demands more from the molding process: higher barrel temperatures (290–310°C recommended vs 280–300°C for GF30), higher injection pressures, and faster screw wear. Standard nitrided screws will wear noticeably faster processing GF50; bimetallic screws and barrels are strongly recommended for sustained production. Gate design matters more with GF50 because the higher viscosity and fiber content increase the risk of jetting and poor knit-line strength.

Conditioned vs Dry: The Moisture Effect

Polyamide 66 absorbs moisture from the environment — typically 1.5–2.5% by weight at equilibrium in 50% RH air. This absorbed water acts as a plasticizer, reducing stiffness and strength but dramatically increasing toughness. The table below shows typical property shifts from dry-as-molded (DAM) to equilibrium at 23°C / 50% RH.

Tài sản Đơn vị GF30 Dry GF30 Cond. GF50 Dry GF50 Cond.
Độ bền kéo MPa 185 120 230 155
Mô-đun đàn hồi MPa 10,000 6,800 17,000 11,500
Charpy Notched (23°C) kJ/m² 12 18 15 22
Charpy Notched (−30°C) kJ/m² 8 7 12 10
Hệ số uốn MPa 9,000 5,800 15,000 10,000

Two observations stand out. First, the property loss from moisture absorption is significant for both grades — tensile strength drops roughly 35% and modulus approximately 32% whether you start at GF30 or GF50. Second, and critically, the conditioned GF50 still outperforms dry GF30 in modulus (11,500 vs 10,000 MPa) and tensile strength (155 vs 185 MPa — roughly comparable). This means that in a humid application environment, the practical stiffness advantage of GF50 over GF30 narrows but does not disappear.

Moisture absorption curve chart for PA66 GF grades at different relative humidity levels
Equilibrium moisture content vs. relative humidity for PA66 glass-filled grades

Commercial Grades and Equivalents

Most PA66 GF30 and GF50 grades on the market are formulated around a standard set of reference products. If your datasheet lists one of the grades below, the properties in this guide should align closely. For cross-referencing, always verify the specific additive package — heat-stabilized (H), impact-modified, or lubricated variants shift individual values.

Supplier PA66 GF30 Grade PA66 GF50 Grade
BASF Ultramid A3EG6 (standard), A3EG7 (35%) A3EG10
DuPont Zytel 70G30HSL, 70G30HSLR 70G50HSLR
DSM Akulon K224-G6, S223-G6 K224-G10, S223-G10
Radici Radilon A RV300 A RV500
Domo Technyl A 218 V30 A 218 V50
Ascend Vydyne R533, R533H R550

BASF’s A3EG6 (GF30) and A3EG10 (GF50) are the most commonly cross-referenced grades worldwide. DuPont’s 70G30HSLR and 70G50HSLR add heat stabilization and lubricant for reduced mold deposit. DSM’s Akulon S223 series targets injection molding with excellent surface finish; the K224 variants are formulated for higher flow. If your application requires UL certification, grades with the “H” suffix from BASF and DuPont carry UL94 HB or V-2 listings by default and V-0 with additional flame-retardant packages.

Commercial PA66 GF resin pellets from major suppliers arranged for comparison
PA66 glass-filled resin pellets: GF30 (left) and GF50 (right) from major suppliers

When to Choose GF50 Over GF30

The decision often comes down to three engineering scenarios where the premium for higher glass loading pays for itself:

Scenario 1: Metal replacement where stiffness is non-negotiable. When your design is drop-in replacing a die-cast aluminum or stamped steel bracket and the existing wall thickness budget is fixed, GF30 may deflect unacceptably. GF50’s modulus of 16,000–17,500 MPa gets you into the stiffness territory of magnesium alloys. The weight savings over metal remain substantial — GF50 is still roughly one-quarter the density of aluminium.

Scenario 2: High-temperature structural load at elevated humidity. Components inside engine bays, turbocharger ducting, or industrial pump housings see both heat and moisture. As shown in the conditioned properties table, GF50 retains approximately 11,500 MPa modulus at equilibrium moisture — still above dry GF30. If your FEA model uses conditioned properties and shows marginal safety factors with GF30, stepping to GF50 is the most direct fix without redesigning geometry.

Scenario 3: Tight dimensional window with low post-mold movement. Parts that must hold precision tolerances across seasonal humidity cycles benefit from GF50’s lower absolute shrinkage and reduced moisture-induced dimensional change. Automotive sensor housings, electronic connector bodies, and precision gear carriers are classic examples.

When to Stay with GF30

GF30 remains the right choice when: your mold already exists and was cut for GF30 shrinkage (retrofitting is expensive); the part has thin walls under 1.5 mm where GF50 might short-shot; you need better surface aesthetics (lower glass content gives smoother as-molded surfaces); or the cost delta matters — GF50 typically commands a 15–25% price premium per kilogram, and molded part weight is also roughly 15% higher due to density.

Selection decision flowchart for choosing between PA66 GF30 and GF50
Decision flowchart for PA66 GF30 vs GF50 material selection in mechanical design

Câu hỏi thường gặp

Sự khác biệt giữa PA66 GF30 và PA6 GF30 là gì?

PA6 GF30 có điểm nóng chảy thấp hơn (khoảng 220°C so với 260°C của PA66) và nhiệt độ biến dạng nhiệt (HDT) thấp hơn (thường là 200–210°C ở áp suất 1,8 MPa so với 245–250°C). Độ bền kéo cũng thấp hơn — PA6 GF30 thường đạt 160–180 MPa so với 180–195 MPa của PA66 GF30. Tuy nhiên, PA6 GF30 dễ gia công hơn, có độ chảy tốt hơn trong các thành mỏng và có bề mặt đẹp hơn. PA6 cũng hấp thụ độ ẩm nhanh hơn một chút. Nên chọn PA66 GF30 khi ưu tiên khả năng chịu nhiệt dưới tải trọng kết cấu; chọn PA6 GF30 cho các chi tiết thẩm mỹ có kích thước lớn hoặc khi khoảng nhiệt độ gia công hẹp.

Loại thép khuôn nào được yêu cầu để sản xuất PA66 GF50?

PA66 GF50 is abrasive due to the high glass fiber content. For prototype or low-volume tools (under 50,000 shots), hardened P20 or 718 steel with nitriding is acceptable. For production volumes above 50,000 cycles, H13 or 1.2344 tool steel hardened to 48–52 HRC is recommended. Gate inserts and runner systems wear fastest; using replaceable inserts with D2 or M2 tool steel at high-wear points extends tool life. Venting depth should be limited to 0.01–0.02 mm to prevent flash with GF50’s low melt viscosity at processing temperatures.

PA66 GF30 và GF50 có thể được khắc bằng laser không?

Đúng vậy, nhưng kết quả có sự khác biệt đáng kể. Các loại PA66 GF tự nhiên (không màu) có thể được khắc laser bằng laser Nd:YAG hoặc laser sợi quang để tạo ra vết khắc màu tối trên nền sáng — tia laser làm cacbon hóa bề mặt polyamide. Tuy nhiên, các sợi thủy tinh trên bề mặt làm tán xạ chùm tia và làm giảm độ tương phản. Loại GF30 cho độ tương phản khắc laser tốt hơn so với GF50 vì hàm lượng nhựa cao hơn trên bề mặt cung cấp nhiều vật liệu hữu cơ hơn để cacbon hóa. Đối với GF50, nên sử dụng các chất phụ gia nhạy cảm với laser hoặc loại vật liệu đã được trộn sẵn để khắc laser (có sẵn từ hầu hết các nhà cung cấp lớn theo yêu cầu) để đảm bảo độ chính xác và độ tương phản cao khi khắc.

Nhiệt độ sử dụng liên tục tối đa của PA66 GF30 và GF50 là bao nhiêu?

There is no single number — it depends on the specific failure criterion. For mechanical load-bearing applications: approximately 120–140°C for GF30 and 130–150°C for GF50 when the load is moderate (under 30% of ultimate tensile strength). For purely thermal exposure without mechanical load: UL Relative Thermal Index (RTI) ratings are typically 130–140°C for both grades when heat-stabilized. Short-term excursions to 180–200°C are acceptable for minutes rather than hours. Above 220°C, oxidative degradation accelerates sharply and service life is measured in hours regardless of glass content. Heat-stabilized variants (suffix “H” or “HS”) extend the thermal aging resistance by 15–25°C over standard grades.

Hãy cùng chúng tôi tạo ra giải pháp tùy chỉnh dành riêng cho bạn.

Trường này là bắt buộc.
Trường này là bắt buộc.
Trường này là bắt buộc.
Trường này là bắt buộc.
Trường này là bắt buộc.
Cuộn lên đầu trang